Re: tool comparing statspacks
From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <be84922b-fac2-4527-8322-e71cd5dd2caa@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
> Since the statspack report is just a script reading the statspack
> tables, why don't you look at the script, look at the tables, and roll
> your own report.
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <be84922b-fac2-4527-8322-e71cd5dd2caa@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 16, 12:06 pm, Eric Junkermann <e..._at_deptj.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Since the statspack report is just a script reading the statspack
> tables, why don't you look at the script, look at the tables, and roll
> your own report.
Looking at the statspack script, and the associated package, and entirely understanding it, is a little more complex than that raw sentence suggests. Especially if you have to compare and contrast different versions of statspack at maybe different levels.
Niall Received on Sun Mar 16 2008 - 16:48:54 CDT