joel garry wrote:
> On Sep 28, 9:53 am, Jerome Vitalis
> <vitalismanN05..._at_gmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:54:08 -0700, joel garry wrote:
>>
>> Well said Joel!
>> But isn't there a typo in number 2?
>
> What might that be? (It's hard to be more specific than what I wrote,
> given parallel and pga and LRU chains and what-all. But if I didn't
> say something correctly, let us know what you think, it may be
> enlightening for everyone.
> ...
Shouldn't point 2 read as follows?
"[...] For example, if some silly SQL reads an entire table to get a
few rows, you wil likely have a lot of unnecessary I/O that *will* fill
up the SGA."
Received on Fri Oct 05 2007 - 06:08:22 CDT
