Re: estimated of CLUSTERING

From: Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:30:25 +0200
Message-ID: <fbpgvt$mlp$1@news2.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

DA Morgan wrote:
> joel garry wrote:
>

>> I think you guys are a little too hard on Andrea here.  I've read that
>> ch. 5 in the past, and just read it again with this thread and a work
>> issue in mind.  Working through the clustering on the work issue, I
>> see it is not relevant.

>
> Perhaps you are correct but my point was the same one I make time and
> time again. Don't do anything unless you have metrics that support
> doing something specific.
>
> I've seen more damage done by people flailing around trying first one
> thing, than another, than I've seen from people that do nothing at all.

Do you teach clustering_factor, it meaning, and consequences?

If so, then why not here?
I read nothing but sheer inquisitiveness (thank you, spell checker!) in the original post.

Wondering minds want to know - ignorance will lead to what you and Sybrand describe.
- --
Regards,
Frank van Bortel

Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFG4EdBLw8L4IAs830RAvzMAJ0XZ4bord5H/Ogrboe9nIvXkTcT2ACfTMAF RFvLYYjG1h2KaNbiedHzoWg=
=Yrzw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Received on Thu Sep 06 2007 - 13:30:25 CDT

Re: estimated of CLUSTERING_FACTOR