Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: continuation...
Noons wrote:
> On Jul 16, 11:54 pm, DA Morgan <damor..._at_psoug.org> wrote:
>> Noons wrote: >>> it is COMPLETELY unacceptable that Oracle continues to >>> deliver new releases without fixing first what are absolutely >>> egregious bugs. >>> Would you like me to publicly go into the details >>> once more? With pleasure. >> I've got what I hope is a better idea ... send the list to me >> describing how to test each and every one of them and I promise to >> open an SR on any that are not fixed in 11g within one week.
In your country perhaps. Here at least 60% of my customers are either in 10g or will be by year's end. Only a very small percentage are in 8.1.7.4 or below.
Of those that haven't upgraded from 9i the main reason is the difficulty of upgrading eBS, Siebel, PeopleSoft, or other large apps. For those with 8i or below the main reason is government mandated certifications such as by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) and FAA (Federal Aviation Administration).
In truth I can't think of a single company in this area: Not Amazon.com, not Boeing, not AT&T, not T-Mobile, not Bank of America, not Washington Mutual Bank, etc. etc. ad nauseum that would agree with your statement.
Maybe things are different in Oz but I've my doubts.
-- Daniel A. Morgan University of Washington damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond) Puget Sound Oracle Users Group www.psoug.orgReceived on Mon Jul 16 2007 - 21:42:34 CDT
![]() |
![]() |