Re: .NET CF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

JB wrote:
> Why reply with such attitude?

Attitude? What attitude?
>
> Have I offended you with my questions?

No what gives you that idea, Joseph? You offend me by: - - not quoting relevant parts of the original post, but just   removing everything.
- - not even using your name.

>
> I aksed what I thought were reasonable questions, especially so given
> that I am new to Oracle.

You got that wrong - being new has nothing to do with questions being reasonable. You could have searched the net, and especially the official oracle sites. You probably would have found Oracle Lite.

>
> Merge replication is not a .NET thing, it is an SQL Server thing, I am
> merely using .NET to initiate the merge. Apparently from your email

OK - thanks for the correction, but is there any relevance? The point was: do not merge different technologie stacks when there's one (1) you can use.

> there is an equivalent, this being Oracle Replication, I will look
> into this and this is perhaps the only useful thing in your reply. I
> was really asking if there was an equivalent to merge replication with
> Oracle, perhaps this was not obvious from my original post?
>

No it was not. You asked four questions, not "if there was an equivalent to merge replication".
Oracle Lite - answer to question 1.
Link - answer to question 2.
Oracle AR - answer to question 3.
And a fair warning not to mix technology stacks, for free. Question 4 - don't know, repeated the warning above.

You're welcome. Not.

• -- Frank van Bortel

Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFGh4HALw8L4IAs830RAlN0AJ4hU3GUdbwH+wnfwYYXIjJTkQoYjgCdEAR1 2unZsEBVPWvE22l4lJe6XpI=
=hjES
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Received on Sun Jul 01 2007 - 05:28:16 CDT