Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: upgrade 9.2 to 10.2

Re: upgrade 9.2 to 10.2

From: Sylvestre <Sylvestre_at_world.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:07:23 +0100
Message-ID: <4554171d$0$16466$426a34cc@news.free.fr>


Hello

Thank for answer, where I can find that DMTS are no longer supported in 10.2 ?

"joel garry" <joel-garry_at_home.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1163115430.472938.222180_at_h54g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Sylvestre wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> Our SAP instances must be upgraded from 9.2 to
>> 10.2, but
>> a lot of tablespace are always in dictionary
>> managed, and it is
>> asked to me to proove that locally is better, I
>> need a test case
>> to do it, does someone have idea about such a
>> demo
>> ?
>>
>> Thank yu
>
> http://www.dizwell.com/prod/node/62 is a good
> explanation of the
> basics. If you really need to come up with a
> demonstration, the secret
> is to make many segments (like repeatedly adding
> copies of dba_objects
> to a table with a small next until you have
> thousands of segments) and
> then have duelling processes add more. What
> happens is that tables in
> the dictionary contend for latching trying to
> add additional segments
> for themselves in addition to the user segments,
> and everything locks
> up. LMT's just have to update a header bitmap,
> much easier.
>
> But really, now it is generally accepted that
> LMT's are better. In
> fact, DMT's are considered deprecated since 9.2.
> http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14238/compat.htm
>
> Note that simply upgrading DMT's to LMT's just
> keeps any issues
> (besides those specific to the dictionary
> tables) intact, it is often
> better to create new tablespaces and move
> objects there, if possible.
>
> Search for LMT on asktom.oracle.com for lots
> more information. It's
> also been discussed on this group.
>
> jg
> --
> @home.com is bogus.
> http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2052310,00.asp
>
Received on Fri Nov 10 2006 - 00:07:23 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US