| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Competition for OraPerf
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 22:06:56 +0000, Richard Foote wrote:
> I'm a consultant and I'm not the slightest bit worried. That's because I
> don't rely on reports that recommend throwing hardware at problems that
> don't exist and solve problems that really do exist by determining what's
> actually wrong ...
Richard, such a statement would hold water if the world was clearly cut
into right and wrong things but, alas, it is not. I thought it was us
Americans who tend to over-simplify things, but I see that Aussies are not
immune to that, either. I have to ask you, just out of curiosity, have
you recently taken a brush-clearing course in Crawford, TX? In the Real
World(TM) there are applications that you don't have source code for,
legacy applications, departments in turmoil, company acquisitions and such
things. Throwing hardware at the problem at hand frequently is the right
thing to do. There are situations in which investing significant time and
effort to learn and develop is the right thing to do and there are
situations in which it is not the right thing to do. I was once working
for a medium sized HMO which, at one point, acquired a small HMO. Small
HMO has had its members database on a single PC, using SQL server. I used
Oracle's migration workbench to stuff things into an Oracle database and
the programmers concocted something that emulated the application that was
previously running against the SQL server. The result was unacceptably
slow. This application had to run only until each member was not properly
entered into the buying HMO's Oracle database. After that, the whole thing
was quietly extinguished. So, Oracle on a Win2k box wasn't good enough.
There were two options:
1) To tune the application properly
2) Create a tablespace and two schemas on the UAT machine, a much
more powerful IBM midrange computer with EMC storage attached to it and let the thing perform through the sheer power of the hardware.
I recommended the second solution and everybody was happy. In 4 months, the whole thing went away and I was told to drop the tablespace, which I gladly did. That was throwing hardware at the problem and it was justified. In principle, there are situations in which I will gladly recommend throwing hardware at the problem.
-- http://www.mladen-gogala.comReceived on Mon Nov 06 2006 - 21:24:44 CST
![]() |
![]() |