Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: recovery issue...
hpuxrac schrieb:
> Volker Hetzer wrote:
>> Volker Hetzer schrieb: >>> Hi! >>> (10.2.0.1, Linux RH ES 4) >>> We've got a tablespace with some logging and some nologging tables. >>> Now we've got some corruption and I took the tablespace offline for >>> recovery. >>> Turned out, the corruption was in the nologging part, recovery failed >>> and whenever I try to do put the tablespace online I get a message >>> that it needs recovery. >>> I'm perfectly happy with losing the nologging tables but how do I >>> achieve that? >>> I've got incremental backups until monday and archivelogs until today. >>> I've opened a SR but so far oracle hasn't responded. >> Ok, I got to talk to support. >> They say the backups are indeed corrupt and it has nothing to do with >> nologging operations. >> What I see from the rman messages is that the monday backup was just fine, >> the tuesday backup failed because of a corrupt block in the users tablespace >> and the archivelogs on tuesday are corrupt. >> Great. >> >> How can such a thing happen?
>
> You can try a couple of things but you should probably keep working
> with oracle support.
I do.
>
> You should be able to use rman to fix the block corruption in the users
> tablespace ( except maybe if you can't read your archived logs? ...
> what do you mean they are corrupt ).
rman reports corruptness in the alert.log.
What happened was that there was a corrupt block in the database.
My normal weekday backup is
backup database incremental level 1 plus archivelogs.
The archivelogs were backed up, the datafile backup aborted the job,
no restore validate took place and when I tried to use the archivelogs
for recovery they were found to be corrupt too.
>
> You can try recovering the "good backup" from monday to a separate
> database and get the data that you want from that tablespace.
I fear that will be the case.
> Block corruption is just something that I encounter in my environment.
> It's a huge danger sign of possible instability in your disk subsystem
> somewhere.
Ok, but what can one do with asm? At least with file based stuff I could
run fsck.
I fear that may be an aftershock of a RAID controller crash we had a few
weeks ago. We added an archivelog target on our netapp filer in order
to cover controller issues. Worked out great. :-(
Volker
-- For email replies, please substitute the obvious.Received on Thu Nov 02 2006 - 14:39:40 CST
![]() |
![]() |