Re: 10gR1 - Checkpoint not complete -

hpuxrac wrote:
> p.santos000_at_gmail.com wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback,
> > I'll be sure to check out Tom's site.. probably tonight.
> > I have increased the logs files from 200MB to their current value of
> > 600MB.
> > Unfortunately, our application generates lots of redo, and there is
> > very little
> > I can do about it. Adding more log files is really not going to
> > help.
> > At this point, I have to find a better way to balance checkpointing
> > with log switches (one could of course argue that increasing the size
> > effects that).
> >
> > thanks for your input.
> > -peter
>
> I would do the searches on asktom and read what he has to say on the
> subject sooner rather than later.
>
> There's a good amount of information and give and take from various
> different posters.
>
> Do the research and understand what you are doing and why before making
> other changes is my recommendation.
>
> Most of the people that hang out on cdos don't appreciate people that
> respond with "top posting". They much prefer people to add on
> additional comments notes at the bottom.
>
> Good luck.

I stand corrected, adding additional log files might actually. I've been checking out some of the content on asktom and it seems that I just have to do some more research. As far as your last comment .. what are "cdos" ? and I'm not sure that I understand the "top posting" comment ? Can you elaborate ?

-peter Received on Fri Oct 27 2006 - 21:44:41 CDT