Re: Rac on Linux

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:00:12 -0700
Message-ID: <1161817210.812129@bubbleator.drizzle.com>

JEDIDIAH wrote:
> On 2006-10-13, DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote:

>> pibru_at_tin.it wrote:
>>> [..]
>>>> - ASM
>>>> - OCFS/OCFS2
>>>> - 3rd party (Veritas, Polyserve, GFS, etc)..
>>> why not raw ?
>> ASM is raw.
>>
>> But under cluster file systems don't leave out NetApp's. It is
>> far better than OCFS/OCFS2.


> 

> 	Not according to Netapp.

> 

> 	Netapp's own publications on the matter show OCFS2 to be

> the clear winner with ASM not even doing that much better than
> NFS.
I understand you may have misread what I wrote so please read it again.

I said NetApp's CFS is better than OCFS and OCFS2.

I did NOT say better than ASM.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org

Received on Wed Oct 25 2006 - 18:00:12 CDT