Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Problems with Listener after patching to 10.2.0.2.0

Re: Problems with Listener after patching to 10.2.0.2.0

From: <RogBaker_at_gmail.com>
Date: 24 Oct 2006 08:29:13 -0700
Message-ID: <1161703753.353306.52770@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>


One of the patches screwed up my listener. I think it was 5251025. I think 5413245 corrected this though. I am on Windows 2003.

Erik Dahle wrote:
> Hi
> I've just done a clean install of 10.2.0.1.0 on a 2-node RedHat Linux ES
> 4 RAC.
>
> I have the following setup:
> 1 home for CRS
> 1 home for ASM
> 1 home for database
>
> The initial install of 10.2.0.1.0 works fine, then I patch up to
> 10.2.0.2.0 (for each oracle_home).
> I need 3 listeners, and I remove the default listener first.
> From netca i make the 3 new, and that seems to work just fine:
>
> $ srvctl config listener -n orarac-01
> orarac-01 LISTENER_1521_ORARAC-01
> orarac-01 LISTENER_1524_ORARAC-01
> orarac-01 LISTENER_1527_ORARAC-01
>
> So far so good, lets start them up:
> orarac-01$ srvctl start listener -n orarac-01 -l LISTENER_1521_ORARAC-01
> CRS-1028: Dependency analysis failed because of:
> CRS-0223: Resource 'ora.orarac-01.LISTENER_1521_ORARAC-01.lsnr' has
> placement error.
>
> I run cluvfy and get this:
> blabla, everything ok
>
> Result: Node connectivity check passed for subnet "10.231.175.0" with
> node(s) orarac-02,orarac-01.
>
> Suitable interfaces for the private interconnect on subnet "10.0.0.0":
> orarac-02 bond0:10.0.0.22
> orarac-01 bond0:10.0.0.21
>
> Suitable interfaces for the private interconnect on subnet "10.231.175.0":
> orarac-02 eth0:10.231.175.22 eth0:10.231.175.32
> orarac-01 eth0:10.231.175.21 eth0:10.231.175.31
>
> ERROR:
> Could not find a suitable set of interfaces for VIPs.
> Result: Node connectivity check failed.
>
> Hm, strange...
> I run vipca, and can only see interface eth0. I belive I should've seen
> eth0, eth2, eth3 and bond0 (eth2 and eth3 are bonded as bond0).
> During my installation of clusterware 10.2.0.1 I had to run vipca after
> running root.sh because of the error: "The given interface(s), "eth0" is
> not public. Public interfaces should be used to configure virtual IPs."
> And all 4 interfaces showed up in vipca then (I selected eth0 and bond0).
>
> My theory now is that Oracle thinks the interconnect subnet is
> 10.0.0.0/8, which conflicts with my vip-subnet. Are there any
> configuration file in CRS that I can check to see which subnet beeing used?
>
> ip addr output:
> 2: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
> link/ether 00:16:35:5b:4f:3e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet 10.0.0.21/24 brd 10.0.0.255 scope global bond0
> inet6 fe80::216:35ff:fe5b:4f3e/64 scope link
> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 3: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
> link/ether 00:11:0a:5c:5d:6e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ffAb
> inet 10.231.175.21/24 brd 10.231.175.255 scope global eth0
> inet 10.231.175.31/24 brd 10.231.175.255 scope global secondary eth0:1
> inet6 fe80::211:aff:fe5c:5d6e/64 scope link
> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>
> Anyone got some thoughts?
>
> Erik
Received on Tue Oct 24 2006 - 10:29:13 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US