Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Functions and where vs. group-by inconsistency
artmt_at_hotmail.com wrote:
> DA Morgan wrote:
>> Martin T. wrote: >>> Hello all. >>> (assuming Oracle 9.2) >>> >>> First of all, does anyone know why the Oracle SQL Parser will not allow >>> us to use the <name>-part of "table.column AS <name>" in where or >>> group-by clauses?? Is this just being lazy on their part, or is there >>> an actual reason behind this? >> Just read the above paragraph a second time. I have no idea what you >> are asking. Is the lack of clarity just being lazy on your part? ;-) >> >> List the version to 4 decimal places when responding. >> -- >> Daniel Morgan >> Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
If he does then I doubt it is any different in any other RDBMS. No product accepts a table_name as a column name of which I am aware.
-- Daniel Morgan University of Washington Puget Sound Oracle Users GroupReceived on Fri Oct 06 2006 - 15:55:17 CDT
![]() |
![]() |