Re: RAC Clusterware Question

From: JEDIDIAH <jedi_at_nomad.mishnet>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:29:17 -0500
Message-ID: <dnv1p3-u53.ln1@nomad.mishnet>

On 2006-07-18, boogab00_at_yahoo.com <boogab00_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> I would definitely recommend ASM. Oracle is putting lots of dev effort
> into it and not OCFS.

OTOH, there's interest in using OCFS as a general purpose CFS. That interest may quickly cause the development effort expended on ocfs to eclipse that of ASM.

The real question is what Oracle support will do when something goes bump in the night and for how long they can be expected to do that particular something.

-- 
     If you think that an 80G disk can hold HUNDRENDS of           |||
hours of DV video then you obviously haven't used iMovie either.  / | \

 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------        
                http://www.usenet.com

Received on Wed Jul 19 2006 - 10:29:17 CDT