Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: object # of extents
Mark D Powell wrote:
> I will disagree on the use of ASSM. Way too many bugs in this feature
> still on 9.2 plus the feature has fairly high space overhead on small
> objects in multiple extents. But locally managed tablespaces are the
> way to go. I prefer uniform extents.
Bingo that's a winner! Received on Wed Jun 28 2006 - 16:19:54 CDT
![]() |
![]() |