Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Bizarre index creation - something wrong?
Paulie wrote:
> Ah, OK, now I understand. They want to have a known named
> index rather than a system name monstrosity.
>
> Does create constraint not work on 7? Anybody know where I
> can get docs on 7? TIA.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/oracle7.html
As far as working on aboriginal, age-old, antediluvian, antiquated, antique, archaic, bygone, cast-off, crumbling, dated, decayed, done, démodé, early, erstwhile, former, hackneyed, hoary, immemorial, late, moth-eaten, of old, of yore, old-fashioned, old-time, olden, oldfangled, once, onetime, original, outdated, outmoded, passé, past, primeval, primitive, primordial, pristine, quondam, relic, remote, rusty, sometime, stale, superannuated, time-worn, traditional, unfashionable, unoriginal, venerable, worn-out software... charge more!
Note that the commit; in your script is unnecessary. DDL does a commit before and after the DDL.
jg
-- @home.com is bogus. "This bug has been hijacked for something different to the problem I reported." - bug 4681142Received on Wed Jun 07 2006 - 13:22:09 CDT
![]() |
![]() |