Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: A voodoo masterpiece

Re: A voodoo masterpiece

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:19:38 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <cmu45p$shu$1@hercules.btinternet.com>

Note in-line

-- 
Regards

Jonathan Lewis

http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ

http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
Optimising Oracle Seminar - schedule updated Sept 19th





"Niall Litchfield" <niall.litchfield_at_dial.pipex.com> wrote in message 
news:1100078183.371334.62530_at_f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

>
> The other suggestion that I'd make is that I at least, but I believe
> others, tend to post demonstrations rather than 'proofs', for example I
> have posted a script to demonstrate uniform index height. You cannot
> use this script per-se to 'prove' that a b*-tree index is *always*
> balanced - one counter-example would be enough. Obviously as the number
> of times you run the script with different variables rises and you do
> not find an unbalanced index the likelihood of the assertion being
> false diminishes. By its nature scientific 'proof' rarely exists - the
> scientific method generally will only disprove theories (though there
> can be exceptions if you can express the theory mathematically).
> However as the number of times predictions are confirmed by different
> tests rises so too should your confidence in the theory.
>
This is actually a very important point, and one of my more generic presentations discusses "justification, demonstration, and proof" along those lines.
Received on Wed Nov 10 2004 - 16:19:38 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US