Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: cursor_sharing=similar
And Oracle support came up with it in ten minutes or so from time of iTar
logging. pretty damn good it seems to me.
-- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA Audit Commission UK "Noons" <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam> wrote in message news:3ffbd3b1$0$18690$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...Received on Wed Jan 07 2004 - 07:08:17 CST
> Thanks, that is a useful piece of info.
>
> --
> Cheers
> Nuno Souto
> wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam
> "Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> wrote in message
> news:3ffbcda9$0$9392$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net...
> > A few days ago I stated that we hadn't been burned with
> > cursor_sharing=similar on 9.2. I spoke too soon. Almost the next day
> > (doesn't that always happen)we hit unpublished bug 2474192 which in our
case
> > prevents us maintaining intermedia indexes with cursor_sharing=similar.
This
> > bug is apparently fixed in 9203 - the server concerned is currently on
9202
> > (that always happens as well).
> >
> >
> > --
> > Niall Litchfield
> > Oracle DBA
> > Audit Commission UK
> >
> >
>
>
![]() |
![]() |