Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: DBMS_JOB.remove
I believe there is quite a lot of undocumented packages out there.
Some have unwrapped (and documented in comments) specs, some
are fully wrapped. $ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin is a good place
for research. :)
And I think the reason DBMS_IJOB is not documented is because it
is supposed to be only used by IMP to import jobs (that 'I' can be
either Import or Internal, but I think Import is more like it.)
-- Vladimir Zakharychev (bob@dpsp-yes.com) http://www.dpsp-yes.com Dynamic PSP(tm) - the first true RAD toolkit for Oracle-based internet applications. All opinions are mine and do not necessarily go in line with those of my employer. "Ryan Gaffuri" <rgaffuri_at_cox.net> wrote in message news:1efdad5b.0302110849.71c4f911_at_posting.google.com... > "Steve Ashmore" <sashmore_at_neonramp.com> wrote in message news:<v4ho6d23i1pd72_at_corp.supernews.com>...Received on Wed Feb 12 2003 - 01:08:35 CST
> > Yes dbms_ijob.remove will do it.
> >
> > There is no public synonym on it so either run it as sys or prefix it with
> > sys.
> > or create a synonym.
> >
> > Stephen C. Ashmore
> > Brainbench MVP for Oracle Administration
> > http://www.brainbench.com
> > Author of: 'So You Want to be an Oracle DBA?'
> >
> > "FC" <flavio_at_tin.it> wrote in message
> > news:wF42a.164485$0v.4614444_at_news1.tin.it...
> > >
> > > "Marcin" <mwolski_at_poczta.fm> wrote in message
> > > news:b2agk9$irm$1_at_sunflower.man.poznan.pl...
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Am I able (as an DBA) to remove any user's job from the queue (dba_jobs)
> > ??
> > > >
> > > > M.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > No, you cannot.
> > > But I am told there is a workaround using a "hidden" package, called
> > > DBMS_IJOB.
> > > I never used it myself, so my advice ends here...sorry!
> > >
> > > Bye,
> > > Flavio
> > >
> > >
> > the only documentation for this is on metalink. are there many > packages that are undocumented? is there a reason, why this might be > undocumented, ie, might change with each release? > > glad i stumbled on this. i think its useful for what im currently > doing.
![]() |
![]() |