Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle versus Microsoft Sqlserver 2000

Re: Oracle versus Microsoft Sqlserver 2000

From: Mike <mike.mcneer_at_umusic.com>
Date: 14 Mar 2002 12:23:25 -0800
Message-ID: <81ffd231.0203141223.1f5eceed@posting.google.com>


Been using DB2 for about 4 years and am now forced to use Oracle . So far Oracle is looking like a big piece of crap compared to DB2. Whats with this SQL *PLUS Worksheet for one thing? Still havent found a way to stop a query from executing... Its the worst looking and using tool for a database I have ever seen. Google advice is to get a third -party tool(???) for queries. Db2 = all tools I need to excute queries. I will admit the javatools can be kinda buggy in Db2 but Oracle doesnt even come close to the functionality. Also Whats with one database per instance?? That another major setback. From what I've seen people get by this by having multiple schemas under one instance not good in my opinion. For Oracle to be a database only company I would think they would have better tools and technology than Db2 or SQL Server but from what I see its not there. The one thing I have seen that I like is the little gui thing that shows you how the memory is being used by tablespaces and bufferpools. As far as SQL Server is concerned never has and never will be a real Relational Database. Yes good for small companies and tasks but would never use it in the Enterprise. Also I dont understand how some people tie themselves into Microsoft products..apparently there not doing their research... Received on Thu Mar 14 2002 - 14:23:25 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US