Re: Redhat vs Win2000

From: Manuel FLURY <manuel.flury_at_amslux.lu>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 10:03:32 +0100
Message-ID: <3be261a7$0$860$626a54ce@news.free.fr>

Oracle is from 2 to 3 time faster on the same machine with Linux than Oracle on W2K.

We use Oracle 9i on Redhat 7.1 for few days, and Oracle 8 on Redhat 6.2 for a while without any problem.

Manuel FLURY
manuel.flury_at_amslux.lu

"Henk Bos" <hbos_at_emirates.net.ae> wrote in message news:9rr060$55q1_at_news.emirates.net.ae...
> Hi all,
>
> We are running Oracle 7.3.2 on SCO-Unix for the last 4 years. Never had a
> major problem. Now we are upgrading our installation and are considering
> Oracle 8.1.7 on Redhat 7.0 (certified by both Oracle and Redhat). Another
> possibility is Win2000.
> Technically I don't have a preference, but on the other side, BG is rich
> enough.
> Key factors are: stability, performance and reliability.
>
> I would appreciate any comments/preferences for both choices.
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> Henk Bos
>
>
Received on Fri Nov 02 2001 - 03:03:32 CST