Re: Oracle on Linux or 2000?

From: <slaguru_at_my-deja.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 16:15:57 GMT
Message-ID: <95ugni$t9h$1@nnrp1.deja.com>

> Glen A. Stromquist <glenstr_at_my-deja.com> wrote:
> > We are in the process of moving existing Oracle databases on to
Win2K
> > boxes from their existing RS6000 boxes for various reasons. I have
> > suggested we consider looking at Linux if we are going to be on
Intel
> > boxes, but will be facing an uphill battle, as we are getting firmly
> > entrenched with windows 2000 servers.
> >
> > However, I still think it is worth looking at at least. I use linux
on
> > a personal basis and am very impressed with its speed and stability,
> > but I have heard that Oracle actually performs better on NT/2000, is
> > easier to manage and install etc..
> >
> > comments or experiences anyone?
> >

Hi

In the middle of this, andthe results are comparable between twin proc W2K servers and Linux on the same system. I find the install and the maintenace better now on W2K, than Linux, and far, far better than NT

Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/ Received on Thu Feb 08 2001 - 10:15:57 CST