Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Enterprise Edition vs Standard
could've been worse , could have been SQL Server <g>
-- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA Audit Commission UK "Van Messner" <vmessner_at_bestweb.net> wrote in message news:rWfT4.2800$v%5.184957_at_newshog.newsread.com...Received on Mon May 15 2000 - 00:00:00 CDT
> The Oracle web site provides a complete documentation of the
> differences. Enterprise has the parallel server, partitioning and other
> nice features. Right now I work for a company around twice the size of
> Apple. All of our databases are Oracle. We just got a quote for a modest
> sized Sun box - 10K for the Standard and 60K for the Enterprise. We
decided
> that nice as Enterprise is, the difference in price is too great.
> Worse yet, management now wants us to look at DB2.
>
>
> <farrellyr5408_at_my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:8fhfu0$cjv$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com...
> > I am hoping somebody might be able to tell the main differences between
> > the standard version of Oracle and the Enterprise Edition. We are
> > renewing our license agreement and there is a substantial difference in
> > cost between the two and if it is no real benefit to go with the EE
> > than we won't. The problem I am having is I'm not sure if we are using
> > the differences or not, so if somebody could point these out then I can
> > tell if we are.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Before you buy.
>
>
![]() |
![]() |