Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Let's Trouble Shoot Dedicate Server Problem !!!

Re: Let's Trouble Shoot Dedicate Server Problem !!!

From: Graham C Thornton <graham.thornton_at_ln.ssw.abbott.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 12:29:34 -0500
Message-ID: <7joslu$ak5@news.abbott.com>


Roger wrote in message <7jk7hl$bjc_at_netnews.hinet.net>...
>Dear Sir:
>
> Our system is OpenVMS 7.1, Oracle 7.3.3.4. We don't use MTS, we only
>have didicate server because our system is only for Fab server operation
>and for performace issue.
>
> We have met a problem these days about dedicated server. We found some
>times
>system increasing to 300 dedicate servers. And these server did not
>disappear,
>CPU time usage is zero. But these server really consume system memory
>resource.
>I must manual kill such processes. I think It is not a normal case. I am
>crazy
>for such condition!!
>
> I had query v$session, v$process, I found only 20 processes, but I
found
>there are double count or more dedicate server (sometimes to 300) processes
>in system. I don't know why??
>
> By the way, I do some test about db-link. If I use db-link to access
>this database. System will fork one dedicate server to service this
>connection.
>But I query v$dblink, there is no any record in this table???
>But when I leave from SQL*Plus, this dedicate server process will automatic
>exit. I think it is normal!!
>
> How can I trouble shoot it!! is this a db-link problem?? or some
>parameter
>must be set (I had set sqlnet.ora expiretime parameter to 10)??? please
>tell me, If you have such experience, thanks a lot!!!
>
>Regards,
> Roger Li
>
>

Roger,

We had a similar problem back at Christmas. If memory serves, the culprit turned out to be Multinet, and a patch was applied to fix the problem

HTH Graham

Empowerment - delegating the responsibility but not the authority.


Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of Abbott Laboratories . Received on Thu Jun 10 1999 - 12:29:34 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US