Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: SQL server Vs Oracle

Re: SQL server Vs Oracle

From: Steffen Krause <krause_at_repas-aeg.de>
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 11:07:15 GMT
Message-ID: <373fed9c.12039271@newshub.astberlin.de>


Jim McCusker <mccusker_at_iname.com> wrote:

>Then why would companies need to hire someone to babysit their Exchange
>server? Those tools are a sysadmin's nightmare because they tend to be
>buggy and unreliable. A programmer can just write an app and then dump
>it on the sysadmin letting him worry about the bugs within the
>technology that app is based on.

Out of curiosity, I just checked my Exchange (and File & Print, and Test-MSSQL) servers uptime: 166 days. And the last reboot was unnecessary (a co-sysadmin booted because Exchange shut down. But the reason was low disk space)

Regards,
Steffen
--
Steffen Krause krause_at_repas-aeg.de
Dipl.-Inf., stepfel_at_gmx.de
Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer
http://www.repas-aeg.de/deutsch/it-services Received on Mon May 17 1999 - 06:07:15 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US