A "Techie" I talked to this morning suggests the opposite - that WS is
actually a better DB server due to less "overhead". Keep in mind the 10-user
limit on WS.
Pete Sharman wrote in message <37288458.D7D4445D_at_us.oracle.com>...
>Eric
>
>From memory, Workstation only supports 10 concurrent users, so if you have
more
>developers than that you'd be in strife. Otherwise, I think the only issue
is
>that Server is better optimized to be a database server than Workstation
is,
>unless you want to start looking at things like the 2 Gb memory limitation
and
>getting around it.
>
>HTH.
>
>Pete
>
>Eric Yu wrote:
>
>> Is there any difference between running Oracle 8 (or 8i) on NT 4
Workstation
>> vs NT 4 Server? Namely, are there OS limitations that will impact Oracle
>> features (supported network connections, etc.).
>>
>> We are looking to use NT4WS+Ora8 as a development and test deployment
>> environment, but don't want to be hamstrung by any OS-specific
limitations.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Eric
>
>--
>
>
>Regards
>
>Pete
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Peter Sharman Email: psharman_at_us.oracle.com
>WISE Course Development Manager Phone: +1.650.607.0109 (int'l)
>Worldwide Internal Services Education (650)607 0109 (local)
>San Francisco
>
>SQL> select standard_disclaimer, witty_remark
> 2 from company_requirements;
>
>Opinions are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of Oracle
>Corporation
>
>"Controlling application developers is like herding cats."
>Kevin Loney, ORACLE DBA Handbook
>"Oh no it's not! It's much harder than that!"
>Bruce Pihlamae, long term ORACLE DBA
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
Received on Thu Apr 29 1999 - 14:18:39 CDT
