Re: Writing PL/SQL in Java.

"Mr. X." <no_spam_please_at_nospam_please.com> wrote in news:f3sp6d$6vb$1_at_news2.netvision.net.il:

> So you don't sugest using mixing java in PL/SQL.
> O.K.
>
> B.T.W - It was just for curiosity that there may be another syntax for
> PL/SQL,
> and what benefites can I make of using Java.
>
> And, no - I didn't find good example on google (which obviously I will
> find my own message as this one).
>
> Thanks :)
>
>

http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11 _QUESTION_ID:883929178230 if it touches data -- plsql.

If it is computing a fourier transformation -- java.

If it is processing data -- plsql.

If it is generating a graph -- java.

If it is doing a transaction of any size, shape or form against data -- plsql

A shovel is a great tool for making a hole in the ground, only when the right end of the shovel come into contact with the Earth.

While Java & PL/SQL are both programming languages they were made to solve two DIFFERENT sets of problems.

Simply stated, PL/SQL was designed to work INSIDE the Oracle database & Java was designed to solve problems OUTSIDE the database.

No significant intersction or overlap occurs. Received on Sat Jun 02 2007 - 17:25:26 CDT