Re: SQL+ question

Sybrand Bakker <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote in news:to24825sgvsi9ucd6o2m7fvp28s1uitk8r_at_4ax.com:

> On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 19:40:49 GMT, ianal Vista
> <ianal_vista_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Did you ever bother to try something like the following:
>>
>>select * from T where Col1 = 1234;
>
> Which would convert the query into one using hardcoded literals with a
> potentially different execution path.
>

What does this point have to do the OP desire to get results set?

>Sometimes I like to take a look at the result set by inspecting the sql
>string in the code at runtime and then pasting it into sql+.
Received on Sat Jun 03 2006 - 18:32:31 CDT