Re: Oracle transactions and DDL statements.

From: <peter.koch.larsen_at_gmail.com>
Date: 10 May 2006 10:38:27 -0700
Message-ID: <1147282706.986996.276260@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>

DA Morgan skrev:

> peter.koch.larsen_at_gmail.com wrote:
> > Sybrand Bakker skrev:
> >
> >> On 9 May 2006 14:09:39 -0700, peter.koch.larsen_at_gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> Right. But thus time it is not a feature, but a limitation that is not
> >>> as i see it is not in any way based on some requirement for logical
> >>> consistency - more like the opposite if anything.
> >> It rather seems you have a basic lack of understanding of relational
> >> and transactional concepts. You probably would better stick to your
> >> Mickey Mouse products.
> >
> > Excuse me, but this is simply false. If you simply must come with
> > personal attacks instead of giving evidence to support your cause you
> > really should reserve that "Mickey Mouse" adjective to describe your
> > own mindset.
> >
> > /Peter
> >
> >
> >> --
> >> Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA

> Actually Peter my instinct here is to agree with Sybrand. Everything
> you've written flies in the face of good practice in an Oracle database.

If I were to develop a new application, naturally I would take the idiosyncracies of the target platform into consideration.. Instead I am porting an existing one that runs on a wide range of platforms - including several databases of which I've already mentioned a few. This should be evident had you read the first post on this thread.

/Peter

> --
> Daniel A. Morgan
> University of Washington
> damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
> (replace x with u to respond)
> Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
> www.psoug.org
Received on Wed May 10 2006 - 12:38:27 CDT