Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: SQL Server Worm devastates Microsoft Corporate networks!
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:00:53 GMT, simoncooke_at_earthlink.net drooled and scribbled:
> Sinister Midget <xunil_at_kc-rr.com> scribbled:
>
>> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:09:10 GMT, simoncooke_at_earthlink.net drooled >> and scribbled: >>> RonB <ronb_at_blizz.34sp.com> scribbled: >>> >>>> Simon Cooke wrote: >>>> >>>>> Most software developers aren't going to care about patches to SQL >>>>> Server -- especially if they don't use it, or are not running a >>>>> site. As far as they're concerned, it's just a part of their dev >>>>> system, and one they don't look at too often. >>>>> >>>>> *That* is why it caused problems for MS. >>>> >>>> Bottom line, M$ didn't take care of the SQL patch in their own >>>> house. And you think other corporatins have more WNDOZE expertise >>>> or time for patches than M$? >>> >>> Bottom line, Linux is a minority OS whose userbase pales in >>> comparison to that of Windows. >> >> What does linux have to do with MICROS~1 not fixing the things right >> under their own noses, then blaming everybody else for the same thing? >> >> That wasn't even close to a reasonable attempt to change the subject. >> That was so blatant that Micro-Soft should fire you NOW for such a >> horrendous slipup!!
OK. "Not servers" brought the system to its knees. Micro-Soft employs the people using "Not servers" and holds some responsibility for their actions and for the overall security. Ergo, $MONOPOLY failed in its responsibility to prevent people using "Not servers" from destroyig everything for everybody.
Trustworthy Computing in action!
> Simon
Sinister
-- I love the way Microsoft follows standards. In much the same manner that fish follow migrating caribou.Received on Tue Jan 28 2003 - 12:56:13 CST
![]() |
![]() |