On 28 Jan 2003 09:23:52 -0800, nobody_at_spam.com drooled and scribbled:
> In article <JIyZ9.346$Wu1.53360_at_newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>, "Simon
> says...
>>
>>Look, schmuckboy, it's quite simple:
>>
>>Lots of dev machines, running MSDE (cut down SQL server for developers)
>>or SQL Server = lots of machines not getting patched, because they're
>>being run by regular developers, not sysadmins.
>>
>>The server farms were being run by sysadmins, not developers, and so
>>were patched -- but got hit by heavy traffic.
>>
>>Now do you understand? Or do you want to show your cluelessness again?
>>
>
> Look, shitboy, it is quite simple:
>
> It is not just the development machines at Microsoft that got affected.
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=562&ncid=738&e=10&u=/ap/20030128/ap_on_hi_te/microsoft_worm
>
> [Microsoft spokesman Rick Miller] acknowledged that some servers were left
> unfixed because administrators "didn't get around to it when they should
> have."
>
> Take that, shitboy.
Now you did it!! Somebody's paycheck is in jeopardy around here now,
and it ain't yours!
--
Every program expands until it can send mail...
...Except Exchange.
Received on Tue Jan 28 2003 - 12:48:35 CST
