Re: From ORACLE-L to DATABASE-L?

Hey,

as I came from SQL Server camp here, I might add a bit different perspective.
I don't think making this general db list is a good idea. First database-l would indicate HANA/MySQL/Postgres/DB2/Teradata/... stuff as well, not to mention Mongo/Redis/Redshift and more. The list will bloat itself into oblivion. Narrowly focused list is more useful unless this is supposed to be social list for DBAs.

On 16 March 2018 at 00:53, Stefan Koehler <contact_at_soocs.de> wrote:

> Hey Tim,
> not quite sure how others handle this but I am totally busy with
> researching, learning and debugging Oracle (and its implementation on
> different operating systems).
>
> I can't imagine how I should learn SQL Server as well and become/stay as
> "good" as right now with Oracle. Becoming very good with one RDBMS is a
> full-time job in my humble opinion :-)
>
> Best Regards
> Stefan Koehler
>
> Independent Oracle performance consultant and researcher
> Website: http://www.soocs.de
> Twitter: _at_OracleSK
>
>
> > Tim Gorman <tim.evdbt_at_gmail.com> hat am 15. März 2018 um 15:56
> geschrieben:
> >
> > How do you personally feel about discussing and learning about SQL
> Server as well as Oracle? Would it enhance your prospects?
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l