Re: Oracle High Availability Question(s)

From: Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:13:48 -0600
Message-ID: <CAJvnOJbyWv=_qTYDDOq2ciJXybA_ZC6dMM4zotnSUWkr7oxB9g_at_mail.gmail.com>



It might be worth the investment to do some serious learning on data guard. There is a lot of capability there, and it sounds like you arent using most of it. At the very least, you can set up a failover type tns entry, with a single service name. Oracle dataguard can be configured to move the service name to the read-write instance. What oracle version are you on?

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Rich J <rjoralist3_at_society.servebeer.com> wrote:

> On 2018/02/14 14:39, Scott Canaan wrote:
>
> We are currently using Data Guard and we hate it. It’s the only place we
> use it and we were never given any training on it, so we threw it together
> as best we could. Every time we have to do anything with it (including
> patching), we pray that it will recover and continue working.
>
> What we have proposed is to go to Linux clustering instead, eventually
> going to Libvert, eliminating the Data Guard and moving the fault tolerance
> to the cluster. The app is not Data Guard aware, so when a failover does
> occur, the app stops working until someone manually points it to the other
> server and restarts it. Linux clustering would solve that problem.
>
> If Linux clustering is an option, perhaps a multi-node hyper-converged
> solution like ones from Simplivity or Nutanix is also an option? I'm not
> sure that gets you out of the Data Guard game though, depending on how
> you're using it.
>
> I only mention that because I'm looking in that direction for a possible
> platform migration myself, and we have ADG.
>
> Rich
>
>
>

-- 
Andrew W. Kerber

'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Feb 14 2018 - 22:13:48 CET

Original text of this message