Re: 2 Exadatas for production + disaster recovery + dev/test

From: Ls Cheng <exriscer_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 21:13:26 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ2-Qb--eDs2vMrgk8h+QmRFwMRox0Mt=ng2d3=qFYN+zMpJfA_at_mail.gmail.com>



Hi

I have seen in a few customers share DR exadata with dev/test environments, it is not unusual since not many can afford a brand new exadata for just DR or just dev/test environments

Thanks

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Stephens, Chris <Chris.Stephens_at_adm.com>wrote:

> After an incredibly long wait, Exadata is finally heading this way. Two
> X4-2 quarter racks.
>
>
>
> Management is thinking about using 1 exa for production disaster recovery
> + dev/test environments. My gut reaction was ... ugh ... but now that I think
> about it, I'm having troubles justifying no disaster recovery and 1
> production exa + 1 dev/test exa. Oracle will be doing all the patching so
> that's not something I/we'll have to worry about. Initially, the database
> environment will be miniscule compared to the horsepower of these machines
> and Oracle has plenty of workload partitioning features that would allow us
> to isolate the disaster recovery activity from the dev/test activity.
>
>
>
> There is a roadmap in place to expand the Exadata environment assuming all
> goes well so this will only be temporary (relatively speaking).
>
>
>
> At this point, we don't really know which databases/applications will
> initially transition to the Exadata environment so this may or may not even
> be a choice for us to make. It may be that disaster recovery is a
> requirement and we'll just have to make it work for the time being.
>
>
>
> Anyways, I figured with all the expertise on oracle-l, I'd throw this out
> there and look for some advantages/disadvantages, gotcha's, things we'll
> need to consider and overall comments.
>
>
>
> Thanks for any input.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
> This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which
> it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by email reply.
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Mar 10 2014 - 21:13:26 CET

Original text of this message