Re: PSU 1 & 2 Not recommended for 12c Multitienant
From: John Piwowar <jpiwowar_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 21:45:44 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJgcjABzVa2mK-8V723cVcYh638azRUBHqD3=dsV0rA6p1X_aA_at_mail.gmail.com>
The note ID and document title still shows up in searches, so perhaps its content is being revised. That is, you may be hitting item #4 on this list.
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 21:45:44 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJgcjABzVa2mK-8V723cVcYh638azRUBHqD3=dsV0rA6p1X_aA_at_mail.gmail.com>
The note ID and document title still shows up in searches, so perhaps its content is being revised. That is, you may be hitting item #4 on this list.
- The document id was entered incorrectly. Please check and try again.
- The document id does not exist (was referenced incorrectly).
- The document is not classified as publicly accessible ("non-public").
- *The content is being updated and it is temporarily unavailable but will be made available again soon.*
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Stojan Veselinovski < stojan.veselinovski_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> According to the following Metalink note we should not be applying psu 1
> or 2 if we have gone multitenant. About 6 months late?
>
> PSU Advisory for Oracle Multitenant Customers<https://support.oracle.com/epmos/faces/SearchDocDisplay?_adf.ctrl-state=145emzg4j4_69&_afrLoop=548712666959019#>
> (1620458.1)
>
> They may have pulled the note as I can't find it today. What is going on?
>
>
> --
> Stojan
> www.stojanveselinovski.com/blog
> www.stojanveselinovski.com
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Mar 06 2014 - 06:45:44 CET