Re: RAC with one node as a DR solution
From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 09:11:47 -0700
Message-ID: <5315FB43.6070902_at_gmail.com>
On 04/03/2014 8:44 AM, Chris King wrote:
> I'm considering a two-node RAC for a new production environment. For
> the DR, I'd hoped to use active data guard, but it's very expensive.
> I've avoided the architectural option of adding a third node, but
> locating it in the DR environment, because the network to DR will be
> slower.
>
Can you explain how the Database license + RAC option for the 3rd node is less expensive than the Database license + Active Data Guard option?
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 09:11:47 -0700
Message-ID: <5315FB43.6070902_at_gmail.com>
On 04/03/2014 8:44 AM, Chris King wrote:
> I'm considering a two-node RAC for a new production environment. For
> the DR, I'd hoped to use active data guard, but it's very expensive.
> I've avoided the architectural option of adding a third node, but
> locating it in the DR environment, because the network to DR will be
> slower.
>
Can you explain how the Database license + RAC option for the 3rd node is less expensive than the Database license + Active Data Guard option?
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Mar 04 2014 - 17:11:47 CET