Re: Install RAC failed at running root.sh step
From: Lu Jiang <lu.jiang69_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:11:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1359137462.17026.YahooMailNeo_at_web120002.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Thanks Hans for the info.
From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com> To: Lu Jiang <lu.jiang69_at_yahoo.com>
Cc: "oracle-l_at_freelists.org" <oracle-l_at_freelists.org> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 6:10 PM Subject: Re: Install RAC failed at running root.sh step
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:11:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1359137462.17026.YahooMailNeo_at_web120002.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Thanks Hans for the info.
From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com> To: Lu Jiang <lu.jiang69_at_yahoo.com>
Cc: "oracle-l_at_freelists.org" <oracle-l_at_freelists.org> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 6:10 PM Subject: Re: Install RAC failed at running root.sh step
On 24/01/2013 3:19 PM, Lu Jiang wrote:
> Thanks Hans.
> We look good on all the items you listed except 3) . We have public
> and VIP interfaces resolved in the hosts files. Should we have them to
> be resolved from DNS as well?
>
>
Either/or. As long as they are resolved exactly the same way for all
nodes, it doesn't really matter during install/create.
For the public stuff, I'm a big fan of both hosts and DNS - end users
use DNS, but nodes don't need to do network hops to respolve. With local
cache it shouldn't matter, but I've experienced hiccups due to DNS
resolutions delays. OTOH, it adds burden on the admin team.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Jan 25 2013 - 19:11:02 CET