Re: Linux OCFS/OCFS2 alternatives for RAC shared storage systems?

From: Bobby Curtis <curtisbl_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:28:38 -0500
Message-ID: <50C8E8F6.2050007_at_gmail.com>

ASM is what most RAC clusters use. Is there a reason why you are not using ASM?

Bobby L. Curtis
(e): curtisbl_at_gmail.com | (t): @curtisbl294 http://dbasolved.com

On 12/12/2012 2:56 PM, Christopher.Taylor2_at_parallon.net wrote:
> I'm curious if anyone uses anything other than OCFS/OCFS2 filesystems for their RAC shared storage areas?
> It seems that OCFS (our version anyway) is not extendable unless you take it offline. A key point for me would be a clustered filesystem that is dynamically growable as needed.
>
> Anyone have any thoughts on the matter?
>
> Chris Taylor
> Oracle DBA
> Parallon IT&S
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Wed Dec 12 2012 - 21:28:38 CET