RE: v$sql - executions vs loads vs invalidations

I may have missed it, but what does v$sql_shared_cursor say is the reason for the invalidations?

--Terry

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Gerry Miller
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 5:38 AM
To: GG
Cc: Oracle-L Group
Subject: Re: v$sql - executions vs loads vs invalidations

Hi GG

These cursors don't have a high version count; there is only one of each, but it has been loaded thousands of times.

I just had a look at Tanel's script and I have already run some queries against X$KSMSS , which suggested that the problem is with subpool 2 (out of 4). I then ran this query:
SELECT KGHLUSHRPOOL "SUBPOOL", KGHLURCR "PINS AND|RELEASES", KGHLUTRN, KGHLUFSH, KGHLUOPS, KGHLUNFU "ORA-4031|ERRORS", KGHLUNFS "LAST ERROR|SIZE" FROM SYS.X$KGHLU and it said that ALL of the ORA_04031 errors occurred in subpool 2. Until then I was sceptical about subpool imbalance being the cause but now I am not so sure.

Thanks for your help on this.

Gerry

GG wrote:
> Good , You've got MOS access ,so
> follow *Troubleshooting: High Version Count Issues [ID 296377.1]
>
> and then **Script - Determine reason for high Child Cursor Count -
> V$SQL_SHARED_CURSOR [ID 1422573.1] .
>
> And I recommend following Carlos Sierra advice related to '*SQLT
> XTRACT' as he is the Author :) that neat tool .
> I had bad experience with cursor sharing similar but looks like FORCE
> could cause troubles as well (unsafe binds).
> Speaking about shared pool imbalance You can use Tanel script:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
>
> --
> -- File name: sgastatx
> -- Purpose: Show shared pool stats by sub-pool from X$KSMSS
> --
> -- Author: Tanel Poder
> -- Copyright: (c) http://www.tanelpoder.com

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l



--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l