Re: NIC binding vs IPMP for RAC interconnect
From: Senthil Subramanian <skumar.sen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:34:27 -0400
Message-Id: <B74A40AC-E499-44A0-B7C6-46D78E6F2BB5_at_gmail.com>
In a RAC system, you should take advantage of both SPOF and load balancing for your interconnects. The NIC bonding or teaming called link aggregation on Solaris platform. IPMP can only provide failover capability. However, on the other hand, NIC bonding(LA) can provide both load balancing and failover capabilities.
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:34:27 -0400
Message-Id: <B74A40AC-E499-44A0-B7C6-46D78E6F2BB5_at_gmail.com>
In a RAC system, you should take advantage of both SPOF and load balancing for your interconnects. The NIC bonding or teaming called link aggregation on Solaris platform. IPMP can only provide failover capability. However, on the other hand, NIC bonding(LA) can provide both load balancing and failover capabilities.
+Senthil
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 27, 2012, at 7:26 PM, "Hameed, Amir" <Amir.Hameed_at_xerox.com> wrote:
> Folks,
> I would like to understand which one is a better option for a RAC
> interconnect: (a) NIC bonding (b) IPMP based failover. The OS is Solaris
> 10, the Grid version is 11.2.0.3 and the RDBMS version is 11.1.0.7 (HAIP
> cannot be used because of the RDBMS version). I am assuming that bonding
> will provide more bandwidth than the IPMP based failover.
>
>
>
> Any feedback will be appreciated.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Amir
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Mar 27 2012 - 18:34:27 CDT