Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: flashback query vs. log miner

RE: flashback query vs. log miner

From: <Paula_Stankus_at_doh.state.fl.us>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:24:34 -0400
Message-ID: <80D4A99A2715674EB2D256DAD89219F6044E8AD3@dohsmail02.doh.ad.state.fl.us>


Guys,

I know you can reconstruct data in a table (given your undo segments in = your undo tablespace is not overwritten) with flashback query. However, you should be able to do the same using = log_minor.

So flashback is easier to work but probably couldn't restore as much as = you could using log_minor. =20

Why would you use one versus the other?



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--

Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
Received on Fri Jul 23 2004 - 16:21:11 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US