Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: L2 cache vs. faster processor

RE: L2 cache vs. faster processor

From: oranix9i <oranix9i_at_bonbon.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:00:19 +0530
Message-ID: <PNEPKGEKDHGPFKGFFKIAEEBDCAAA.oranix9i@bonbon.net>


Under Normal circumstnes having an L2 cache seems to be an good idea. Nix

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Paul Drake Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 10:40 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: L2 cache vs. faster processor

marketing pop-ups here:

http://intel.com/business/bss/products/server/xeon/index.htm?iid=ipp_srvr_pr oc_xeon+xeon_srvr&

they state that the 4 MB 3.2 GHz Xeon MPs are 3 times as fast as the 700 MHz 1 MB cache model.

I have one more day to benchmark on a dual Opteron system before the eval system goes back. HP offers no 64 bit support for their integrated RAID controllers. "Oh, if you want to run 64 bit, buy an Itanium system".
Still run by them marketing types.

makes me wanna buy a Sun Opteron-based server.

post your code, and I'll run it tomorrow.

Pd



Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thu Jul 15 2004 - 02:02:12 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US