Re: How to normalize this?
From: Jan Hidders <hidders_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 17:38:17 +0200
Message-ID: <518136e9$0$6366$e4fe514c_at_dreader35.news.xs4all.nl>
>
> Not sure if I'm thinking of the same kind of thing as you, but I'm
> thinking of CUSTOMERs that have an AGE, where AGE determines [some kind
> of] COMMERCIAL _CLASS.
>
> AGE and COMMERCIAL_CLASS don't become facts that are "independent" from
> there being a CUSTOMER to begin with.
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 17:38:17 +0200
Message-ID: <518136e9$0$6366$e4fe514c_at_dreader35.news.xs4all.nl>
On 2013-05-01 13:08:38 +0000, Erwin said:
> Op woensdag 1 mei 2013 11:20:47 UTC+2 schreef Jan Hidders het volgende:
>> On 2013-04-30 22:17:44 +0000, Erwin said: >> >> And I would argue that in practice the different>> components usually >> turn out to be independent facts anyway. The fact>> that they have >> different underlying dependencies already sort of hints>> at that. But >> if you have a realistic example that would show otherwise,>> that would >> be interesting.
>
> Not sure if I'm thinking of the same kind of thing as you, but I'm
> thinking of CUSTOMERs that have an AGE, where AGE determines [some kind
> of] COMMERCIAL _CLASS.
>
> AGE and COMMERCIAL_CLASS don't become facts that are "independent" from
> there being a CUSTOMER to begin with.