Re: The same simple question to relational theorist (with video now).

Le jeudi 4 avril 2013 20:22:04 UTC+2, Jan Hidders a écrit :
> On 2013-04-01 16:29:26 +0000, Evgeniy Grigoriev said:
>
>
>
> > Hi everyone.
>
> > Last year I asked a question:
>
> > "…is a way of how I create the normal relations important? Suppose a
>
> > part of system exists which creates the relations according to some
>
> > external non-normar expression descrided some data. This part of system
>
> > translates external expression into commands which create a set of
>
> > normal relations. So user of such system gives to the system some
>
> > non-normal data description expressions but operates with the data
>
> > presented in form of normal virtual relations only. (once again - all
>
> > data are presented for user in form of normal relations). Is such
>
> > system relational?"
>
>
>
> The answer depends a little on how you define "the relational model"
>
> and that is not uncontroversial, but I would say that if the generated
>
> tables satisfy all the required properties of relations and you
>
> manipulate them in the relational way, they are relational.
>
>
>
> > Now I can demonstrate a prototype which implements a very simple idea:
>
> > as soon as data have been described in object-oriented way, they are
>
> > immediately represented in relational way. You can see a video by link
>
> > (720HD is available) ---> http://youtu.be/K9opP7-vh18 .
>
>
>
> So how does your ORM differ from the other ones, like for example Hibernate?
>
>
>
> -- Jan Hidders

A new ORM. Check this one out.

http://www.maddash.net/videos/intersystems/cache/demo/ Received on Fri Apr 05 2013 - 00:43:22 CEST