Re: Question on Structuring Product Attributes
From: <derek.asirvadem_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 11:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <b39d075b-1375-4c87-977c-73783a59e744_at_googlegroups.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 11:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <b39d075b-1375-4c87-977c-73783a59e744_at_googlegroups.com>
Hugo
On Monday, 4 February 2013 12:01:28 UTC+11, derek.a..._at_gmail.com wrote:
"Syntax changes" has now expanded to include platform-specific SQL implementation considerations and platform-specific performance issues (eg. that the use of Functions would be crippling).
- For you Hugo, I retract that offer.
- For anyone else, who is a MS SQL specialist, and who can understand my code, in toto, and who can work with, and around any MS platform specific issues, the offer remains open. That is, anyone who is genuinely interested in making it work, correctly , and fast, who is free of mental conditions that may cause them to sabotage themselves and blame others for it. If you like, I will supply intended-for-MS code, and you mess with it; we work back-and-forth handling issues, and make joint decisions re options, etc. As per normal professional adult IT working environment, where everything is recorded, and that is not an issue.
Apostates need not apply.
No circular references, no duplication of any software or data asset.
ACID Transactions only (you *must* be conversant in that; autocommit boffins need not apply).
If you cannot write a test to load 16 million rows in less than 15 minutes development time, you need not apply.
Half a day total development time, not counting communication time, is my estimate.
Cheers
Derek
Received on Thu Feb 07 2013 - 20:39:45 CET