Re: some information about anchor modeling
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 07:57:07 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a5112c84-2783-4f10-885e-6cfa72a93503_at_googlegroups.com>
Dana srijeda, 5. prosinca 2012. 22:41:56 UTC+1, korisnik Eric napisao je:
> On 2012-12-05, vldm10 <vldm10_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2012-11-29, Eric <eric_at_deptj.eu> wrote:
> > Of course, if you think that my examples are not correct, please post
>
> > it. But please be specific. So, please specify a concrete my example
>
> > which is not correct, and give an explanation. Given that your comments
>
> > were not specific, I can not accept them seriously.
>
>
>
> It has taken me this long to make any sense out of your examples at all,
>
> and anyway picking on them individually is pointless when you seem to
>
> have so many more fundamental confusions. Also, as I said above, your
>
> examples do not explain why it is surrogates specifically that are the
>
> problem.
Given that your comments were not specific, I can not accept them
seriously.
I'm sorry, but I will not read your posts any more. I have no time
for such phraseology, at such a level.
In fact, it seems to me, I need a parachute to get down to that
level.
> One might as well claim that you cause car crashes by looking
>
> out of a nearby window.
Vladimir Odrljin Received on Sun Dec 09 2012 - 16:57:07 CET