Re: Keeping schema static as objects are added

> fucking programmers who don't want to
>
> learn the database theory we already have, and who thinks the ease with
>
> which we can shape even an SQL database is the problem! I cannot count
>
> the times (it must be into the thousands) that I have heard programmers
>
> say this or that SQL DBMS is too inflexible and then without skipping a
>
> beat they describe all the code changes they have to make because
>
> someone used one ALTER TABLE to add a column, or two CREATE TABLE AS
>
> SELECT statements to decompose a table. Even SQL, as shit as it is, is
>
> unimaginably more advanced than your 1960s era nonsense.
>
>

With my platform (and schema) I will generate table interfaces and forms with 1 SQL statement (no app server). Prove it that it's 1960's nonsense.

>
>
> Fuck off

so long :) Received on Tue Nov 27 2012 - 17:00:17 CET