Re: Very simple question to relational theorists.

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <0102720e-9e40-4d12-8455-357377822c3d_at_googlegroups.com>


It can only be orthogonal to ra. ra theory lack of consistent quantifiers circumvents such possibility.

Le jeudi 3 mai 2012 22:27:51 UTC+2, Evgeniy Grigoriev a écrit :
> Suppose I’ve created a number of normal relations.... Then I use only
>
> relational algebra operations on these relations to get new relational
>
> values which are possible presented in virtual relations. Also in all
>
> these operations I use RENAME operator on attribute names to rename
>
> them according to some special rules. The new attribute names of the
>
> virtual relations are complex enough (e.g. “details of bills”) and can
>
> contain a dot inside (e.g. “bills.details”)
>
>
>
> Is this system the relational one?
Received on Thu Aug 23 2012 - 01:15:51 CEST

Original text of this message