Re: Very simple question to relational theorists.
From: Roy Hann <specially_at_processed.almost.meat>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:04:58 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <k0mm7a$eii$2_at_speranza.aioe.org>
>> On 5/4/2012 2:01 AM, Roy Hann wrote:
>> Is such system relational?
>> I'm asking about this because it seems that I use reference constructions
>> and all these dots seem to be the "physical details" you are speaking
about. But in fact it's just play with names which is performed by RENAME operation.
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:04:58 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <k0mm7a$eii$2_at_speranza.aioe.org>
compdb_at_hotmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, August 17, 2012 8:37:23 AM UTC-7, Evgeniy Grigoriev wrote:
>> On 5/4/2012 2:01 AM, Roy Hann wrote:
>>> Be careful: "some special rules" is handwavy enough that it could mean >>> anything--including exposing physical details.
>> Is such system relational?
>> I'm asking about this because it seems that I use reference constructions
>> and all these dots seem to be the "physical details" you are speaking
about. But in fact it's just play with names which is performed by RENAME operation.
Just for the record, someone's newsreader is attributing comments to me when posting follow-ups.
-- RoyReceived on Sat Aug 18 2012 - 02:04:58 CEST