Re: Binary Relational Modeling call

From: Bob Badour <bob_at_badour.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:24:58 -0700
Message-ID: <d_Wdnd1fZdCgqPDTnZ2dnUVZ5sOdnZ2d_at_giganews.com>


Cimode wrote:

> <<those 2 are crutial structural components of BRM. however, notation
> of uniqueness of elements is welcome to take place in graphs (one-to-
> one relationship is done in the same way many-to-may relationship is,
> with intermediate set, but with uniqueness constraint). although i'm
> aware of importance of uniqueness, uniqueness notation is not
> specified and programmers have to implement one in the way they find
> appropriate.>>
> Subjective need for uniqueness. I wonder what would happen in a
> family, if one of the two parents decides to name all or some of the
> children with the same name.

Bad choice. See George Foreman. Received on Mon Sep 12 2011 - 00:24:58 CEST

Original text of this message