Re: Binary Relational Modeling call

Ivan wrote:

> this is another link to n-ary. this time is bitmap:
> https://sites.google.com/site/binaryrelationalmodeling/home/n-ary%281%29.png
>
> yes, my fault, i'm aware now i didn't give you a reason to distinct me among spammers (if there exist any spammer in the world, as they are people also).
>
> i'm really not interested in that it has to be "my" group. my interests lay in proposal of actual development of application that implements the concept. as i don't have a time for development, all i thought is that someone else might be interested in programming. and i don't have any interest either in earning from, or in being referenced in end user app. totally royalty free using. after all, the concept isn't all my idea.
>
> all of you, and i mean it, all of you are invited to ask any question about any of your interest, as i feel capable of answering matter related to programming, either in private or in public (remember, i'd like to see actual app running).
>
> once again, my apologies for promising much, as now i see that i don't really have so much. anyway, if you have an interest, you may count on me, totally royalty free.
>
> also, please note that i am not a vampire.
> thank you in advance
> bip bip :}

Teacher looks an awful lot like a tenary relation not a binary relation.

The arrows seem to indicate one can easily access the Text for teacher, for example, from Teacher, but one cannot so easily access the Teacher for being taught, for example, from Text. Is that correct? Received on Sun Sep 11 2011 - 01:52:42 CEST